Date
23 Aug 2022Category
Advisory, Business AccountingThe ruling from the recent Hashmi v Lorimer-Wing High Court case has determined that a private limited company which has adopted model articles must have a minimum of two directors.
What is the problem?
The general understanding of the model articles was that, pursuant to model article 7(2), a company with one director could make decisions without regard to any other provisions in the articles relating to director’s decision making.
However, the High Court ruling has determined that model article 11(2) (quorum for directors’ meetings) imposes a requirement for a company to have a minimum of two directors, and as such model article 7(2) cannot be relied on to overrule the other decision-making procedures. The High Court’s ruling ultimately suggests that any decision taken by a sole director may be invalid and could therefore be open to challenge.
The ruling affects the following:
Failure to act may result in relevant companies being refused finance and dividend transactions (amongst all other business decisions) possibly being deemed invalid.
Possible solutions to consider
It is anticipated that either; the Government will look to review the model articles and clarify the conflicted articles; or that the decision made may be appealed in due course.
In the interim, should you have any concerns on the decisions made by a sole director, the following solutions are available for you to consider:
We are here to help
If you’d like to discuss any of the above or how the ruling could affect your business, please get in touch with your usual Azets advisor or a member of our specialist team.